MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4405097895 · doi:10.1016/j.cattod.2024.115155

Predicting active, selective and stable Mo2C–based bimetallic carbides for direct deoxygenation and hydrogenation reactions: A computational screening

2024· article· en· W4405097895 on OpenAlexafffund
Sagar Bathla, Rui Tan, Samir H. Mushrif

Bibliographic record

VenueCatalysis Today · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicCatalysis and Hydrodesulfurization Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaAlliance de recherche numérique du CanadaAlberta InnovatesNanyang Technological UniversityUniversity of Alberta
KeywordsDeoxygenationBimetallic stripCatalysisCarbideChemistryCombinatorial chemistryOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Transition metal carbides (TMCs), especially molybdenum carbide (Mo 2 C), represent an economical and attractive alternative to precious noble metal catalysts for processes involving hydrogenation (HYD) and direct deoxygenation (DDO) reactions such as hydrodeoxygenation (HDO). Although Mo 2 C has good activity for DDO, it is not selective as it displays similar activity towards HYD as well. Moreover, stability against oxygen poisoning is a critical issue as it is the major reason of catalyst deactivation. Herein, using model compounds with different oxygen functionalities (phenol, guaiacol, and 5-HMF), we employed density functional theory (DFT) calculations to investigate three key reactions (C-O dissociation, oxygen removal and ring hydrogenation) representing activity, stability and selectivity which are critical to the HDO process on 45 Mo 2 C-based bimetallic carbide catalysts (Co, Cr, Fe, Mn, Nb, Ni, Ti and Zr) obtained from the Materials Project database. Among these catalysts, different dopants, stoichiometric ratios and terminations were considered. First, reaction energies of oxygen removal were used to identify stable catalysts. Subsequently, with the energy barriers of DDO and HYD for activity and their differences for selectivity, best candidates for DDO (Mo-terminated Fe 3 Mo 3 C, Mn-terminated Mn 3 Mo 3 C and Ni-terminated Ni 3 Mo 3 C) and HYD (triclinic Mo-terminated Fe 11 MoC 4 and Ni-terminated Ni 6 Mo 6 C) were identified. Since strong oxygen binding favors DDO but hinders oxygen removal, an optimal range of oxygen binding energy (OBE) between -100 kJ/mol to -200 kJ/mol has been proposed. In addition, a parameter encompassing the three critical aspects (activity, stability, and selectivity) of a catalyst was proposed. Using OBE as a descriptor and the proposed parameter, a qualitative trend was obtained which can be used for preliminary screening of large databases of catalysts, including TMCs other than Mo 2 C-based, for processes involving DDO and HYD reactions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.283
Threshold uncertainty score0.657

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCatalysis TodaySame topicCatalysis and Hydrodesulfurization StudiesFrench-language works237,207