Les facteurs de motivation des étudiants universitaires canadiens à apprendre le français.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Selon Drnyei (2005), la motivation est le catalyseur de l'apprentissage d'une L2 qui explique les raisons pour lesquelles une personne choisit d'tudier une langue.Bien que le gouvernement canadien encourage le bilinguisme dans les deux langues officielles, il promeut davantage la langue franaise en raison de la plus grande prsence de l'anglais.Les recherches prcdentes sur les motivations des tudiants apprendre le franais au Canada ont dtermin que les meilleures perspectives d'emploi et le rle du franais au Canada constituaient des facteurs de motivation notables.Cependant, il existe peu d'tudes sur la motivation des tudiants universitaires apprenant le franais dans les universits anglophones.Les rsultats de notre questionnaire rvlent que ces tudiants sont motivs la fois intgrativement et instrumentalement et visent utiliser le franais en dehors de la salle de classe.Certains facteurs contribuent fortement motiver ces tudiants, notamment le rle de l'enseignant.Les implications pdagogiques et les stratgies futures sont discutes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".