MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4405098610 · doi:10.22215/etd/2024-16159

Poor Black Woman. The Surveillance of Class, Race, and Gender in Canadian Urban Planning: An Autoethnography

2024· dissertation· en· W4405098610 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Fathiya Warsame

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicUrban, Neighborhood, and Segregation Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAutoethnographyOppressionEthnographyGender studiesRace (biology)SociologyIdentity (music)Participant observationPovertyRacismClass (philosophy)Work (physics)Political scienceSocial scienceEngineeringAnthropologyArtLawAesthetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Leveraging my own lived experiences, this thesis unpacks how Ottawa Community Housing Corporation (OCH) has quietly reorganized its parking practices to further surveil predominantly racialized and precarious individuals in their communities.By using a mixed-methods, ethnographic approach that includes autoethnography, participant observation, interviews, and online archival work, I argue that this OCH parking regime is an extension of historical urban planning processes in Canada.One that reinforces racialized dispossession and oppression, and that this parking system feeds racialized bodies into broader global surveillance systems.Through the lens of class, race, and gender, I provide a historical analysis of how each identity we intersect with increases the likelihood that we will not only live in poverty but become entrapped in systems that work closely together to survey, control, and punish us based on social markers.By the end of this thesis, readers should have a clear understanding of how the position that Black peoples find themselves in today is not by chance but a built-in feature of white supremacist systems, and what it means to be a poor Black woman in Canada. "I'm from the mud. I cannot afford to lose focus." -ShayboWith love and humility, I would like to thank all those who gave so much to get me to this point.My hooyo (mother) and aabe (father) who instilled a deep sense of integrity in my siblings and I and immersed us in advocacy work from a very young age.Something that has defined every decision that I have made throughout my life.My older sister Faduma who has always been my rock and has kept me anchored.I could never repay you for all the sacrifices you've made.I'm grateful that during our lifetime we went from supporting each other through traumas to building a future together that is filled with joy and unlimited imaginings.My siblings (Lukman, Bukhari, Raja, Abii, Omar, Jim, Abdifitah, Asha, and Ayan) who have always supported the moves I've made, even if they did not fully understand it.My mother's siblings especially habaryar Zahra who would sign the back of her cheques and give it to my hooyo.She even went so far as to pawn some of her gold jewelry and give the money to

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.047
Threshold uncertainty score0.336

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0470.012
Scholarly communication0.0050.002
Open science0.0020.004
Research integrity0.0020.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.330
Teacher spread0.292 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicUrban, Neighborhood, and Segregation StudiesFrench-language works237,207