MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4405098763 · doi:10.22215/etd/2024-16234

Conquering the Frozen Frontier through Epigenetics: Red-Eared Slider Turtles’ Battle for Survival in Ice-Encased Ponds

2024· dissertation· en· W4405098763 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Panashe Darius Kupakuwana

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAdipose Tissue and Metabolism
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEpigeneticsHistoneBiologyAcetylationHistone methyltransferaseCell biologyMethylationRegulation of gene expressionGeneGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Red-eared slider turtles (Trachemys scripta) have a remarkable adaptation that allows them to withstand prolonged periods of anoxia in ice-locked ponds during Canadian winters.Their survival is characterised by metabolic rate depression (MRD) which prioritises energy to pro-survival pathways and minimalizes energy expensive pathways by suppressing gene expression.Amongst many biochemical processes, epigenetic histone lysine acetylation and methylation play crucial roles in regulating gene expression during MRD, but they remain uncharacterised in skeletal muscle of red-eared slider turtles.This thesis presents evidence of epigenetic controls on histone lysine acetylation and methylation in red and white skeletal muscle tissue of the red-eared slider turtles.Many enzymes and histone marks showed trends that were consistent with downregulation of gene expression during anoxia.Other proteins and histone marks exhibited unexpected trends in relative protein expression, changes that were attributed either to non-histone target roles or pro-survival pathways needed by the turtle to survive. PrefaceThis integrated M.Sc.thesis is composed of two main research papers that are currently awaiting

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.326
Teacher spread0.297 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdipose Tissue and Metabolism→French-language works237,207→