MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4405099389 · doi:10.22215/etd/2024-16280

Topology and Uniqueness of Optimal Plans for Multi-marginal and Stratified Mass Transport Problems

2024· dissertation· en· W4405099389 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAerospace Engineering and Control Systems
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsUniquenessTopology (electrical circuits)MathematicsMathematical optimizationComputer scienceCombinatoricsMathematical analysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

First and foremost, I would like to express my heartfelt gratitude to Professor Abbas Moameni, my supervisor, who has guided me in both scientific and everyday aspects of life.His undivided attention, continuous encouragement, and, above all, his passion as a supervisor have been the motivating factors behind my journey in academia.It goes without saying that his extensive knowledge and meticulous guidance, coupled with the way he articulates complex problems, have been remarkably inspiring and have made researching in this field an immensely pleasurable experience.My time in the PhD program under Professor Momeni's supervision will always hold a special place in my heart.I wish to express my genuine appreciation to the members of the examination committee for their effort in reviewing

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.556
Threshold uncertainty score0.889

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it