MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4405108631 · doi:10.1111/opo.13431

Variation of Bruch's membrane opening in response to intraocular pressure change during scleral lens wear, in a population with keratoconus

2024· article· en· W4405108631 on OpenAlex
Langis Michaud, Steve Balourdet, Dan Samaha

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueOphthalmic and Physiological Optics · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicOcular Surface and Contact Lens
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsKeratoconusOphthalmologyScheimpflug principleIntraocular pressureScleral lensLens (geology)Internal limiting membranePopulationGlaucomaMedicineBruch's membraneOptical coherence tomographyCorneaOpticsRetinalVisual acuityMacular holePhysicsRetinal pigment epithelium

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PURPOSE: The present study aimed to determine the potential impact of scleral lenses on intraocular pressure (IOP) by analysing the Bruch's membrane opening-minimum rim width (BMO-MRW) while the lenses are worn, in a population with keratoconus. METHODS: Participants were required to have keratoconus and be successfully fitted with scleral lenses for at least 3 months. A new pair of optimised scleral lenses was provided before the study. During the first session, corneal biomechanics was assessed using an air tonometer, coupling Scheimpflug technology. Then, a scan of the optic nerve was carried out using optical coherence tomography (OCT) at 2 h intervals for 6 h. Particular attention was paid to identifying the BMO-MRW, which represents the smallest distance between the BMO and the internal limiting membrane. These tests were repeated, respecting the time at which the initial measurements were taken, while the scleral lens was worn. Results from only one eye were analysed. RESULTS: A statistically significant change of 10.5 ± 3.6 μm (95% CI [241.3-473.1]; p = 0.02) in BMO-MRW was observed after 6 h of scleral lens wear, compared to measurements without lenses (4.8 ± 3.4 μm; 95% CI [285.1-439.7]; p = 0.18). The fluctuation was greater in participants with keratoconus than found in a previous study of regular corneas. CONCLUSION: BMO-MRW became significantly thinner after 6 h of scleral lens wear compared with measurements without lenses. These variations may be associated with a rise in IOP during lens wear. Close monitoring for optic head changes should be carried out for patients at risk. These results should be compared with future longer-term studies including a larger cohort of patients.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.937
Threshold uncertainty score0.358

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.279
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it