Catastrophic antiphospholipid syndrome: a CAPS-tivating hematologic disease
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Catastrophic antiphospholipid syndrome (CAPS) is a rare but life-threatening form of antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) defined by the rapid onset of large and small vessel thrombosis occurring simultaneously across multiple sites, resulting in multiorgan dysfunction. The presence of underlying immune dysfunction causing activation of coagulation and, in many cases, abnormal complement regulation predisposes these patients to thrombotic events. CAPS is often preceded by triggering factors such as infection, surgery, trauma, anticoagulation discontinuation, and malignancy. Given the high mortality rate, which may exceed 50%, prompt recognition and initiation of management is required. The detection of antiphospholipid antibodies and the histopathologic identification of microvascular ischemia via tissue biopsy are required to diagnose CAPS. However, these patients are often too unwell to obtain results and wait for them. As such, investigations should not delay CAPS therapy, especially if there is strong clinical suspicion. Management of CAPS requires "triple therapy" with glucocorticoids, intravenous heparin, therapeutic plasma exchange, and/or intravenous immunoglobulin. Treatment for refractory disease is based on poor-quality evidence but includes anti-CD20 (rituximab) or anticomplement (eculizumab) monoclonal antibodies and other immunosuppressant agents, either alone or in combination. The rarity of this syndrome and the subsequent lack of randomized clinical trials have led to a paucity of high-quality evidence to guide management. Continued international collaboration to expand ongoing CAPS registries will allow a better understanding of the response to newer targeted therapy.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.007 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.008 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".