Rapid virucidal activity of an air sanitizer against aerosolized MS2 and Phi6 phage surrogates for non-enveloped and enveloped vertebrate viruses, including SARS-CoV-2
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT An air sanitizer was evaluated using an aerobiology protocol, compliant with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s Air Sanitizer Guidelines, for virucidal activity against bacteriophages Phi6 and MS2 (used as surrogates for enveloped and non-enveloped human pathogenic viruses). The phages were suspended in a medium containing a tripartite soil load simulating body fluids and aerosolized using a six-jet Collison nebulizer in an enclosed 25 m 3 aerobiology chamber at 22 ± 2°C and 50 ± 10% relative humidity. The air sanitizer was sprayed into the chamber for 30 s. Viable phages in the air were captured directly, in real time, on host bacterial lawns using a slit-to-agar sampler. Reductions in viable phage concentration ≥3.0 log 10 (99.9%) were observed after a mean exposure of 3.6 min for Phi6, suggesting efficacy against enveloped viruses (e.g., SARS-CoV-2, influenza, and RSV), and ~10.6 min for MS2, suggesting virucidal efficacy for non-enveloped viruses (e.g., noroviruses and rhinoviruses). This targeted air sanitization approach represents an important non-pharmaceutical public health intervention with virucidal efficacy against airborne viral pathogens. IMPORTANCE Airborne viruses are implicated in the transmission indoors of respiratory and enteric viral infections. Air sanitizers represent a non-pharmaceutical intervention to mitigate the risk of such viral transmission. We have developed a method that is now an ASTM International standard (ASTM E3273-21) as well as a test protocol approved by the U.S. EPA to evaluate the efficacy of air sanitizing sprays for inactivating airborne MS2 and Phi6 bacteriophage (used as surrogates for non-enveloped and enveloped human pathogenic viruses, respectively). The test phages were individually suspended in a soil load and aerosolized into a room-sized aerobiology chamber maintained at ambient temperature and relative humidity. Reductions in viable phage concentration ≥3.0 log 10 (99.9%) were observed after a mean exposure of 3.6 min for Phi6, suggesting efficacy against enveloped viruses (e.g., SARS-CoV-2; influenza; RSV), and ~10.6 min for MS2, suggesting virucidal efficacy for non-enveloped viruses (e.g., noroviruses and rhinoviruses). The data suggest the utility of the air sanitizer for mitigating the risk of indoor viral transmission during viral pandemics and outbreaks.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".