Form and function in ecologizing spatial planning: learnings from Bogotá, Colombia
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We explore the emergence of ecological concerns in urban planning in Bogotá, Colombia. Although ecologizing urban planning practices has been a recurrent theme in Bogotá for around three decades, the sustainability problems the city is facing remain addressed in a rather abstract way. We analyze urban and spatial planning by triangulating data from interviews with local stakeholders, a close reading of policy documents, and participant observations. Our examination of the evolving idea of urban nature revealed how ecological considerations circulating in the urban planning processes form the core of the idea of nature in the city. However, this approach has been more focused on form than content, subordinating social-ecological processes and ecosystem functions to the profit-driven and spatially discrete development of urban space. Moving beyond the implementation-failure approach, a more radical rethinking and reworking of planning is needed, incorporating new democratic practices in which the history and paths of situated urban ecologies can be traced, identified, and even mapped.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it