MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4405114241 · doi:10.3389/fenvs.2024.1479754

Dissolved nitrous oxide emissions associated with agricultural drainage water as influenced by manure application

2024· article· en· W4405114241 on OpenAlexafffundabout
David L. Burton, Holly D.M. Wilts, John Macleod

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers in Environmental Science · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicSoil and Water Nutrient Dynamics
Canadian institutionsHealth PEIUniversity of Prince Edward IslandDalhousie University
FundersAgriculture and Agri-Food CanadaNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaDepartment of Agriculture, Nova Scotia
KeywordsNitrous oxideEnvironmental scienceDrainageManureAgricultureEnvironmental chemistryGreenhouse gasAgronomyEnvironmental engineeringChemistryEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Nitrous oxide (N 2 O) is highly water soluble and can be readily transported in waters draining from agricultural fields. Relatively few studies have quantified N 2 O losses through agricultural tile drainage systems and none have compared the effect of different sources of applied nitrogen or their timing of application. While IPCC guidelines provide estimates of emissions from agricultural drainage water, the uncertainty in these estimates is relatively high. This research quantifies N 2 O loss in tile drainage water, as influenced by nitrogen source and timing. The study site was located at Agriculture Canada research station, Harrington, PE, Canada and consisted of 12 plots with subsurface drainage systems installed at approximately 80 cm, separated by buffer drains. Three swine manure treatments were considered with inorganic fertilizer (ammonium nitrate) as a control, each replicated three times. Manure treatments included fall and spring application of solid swine manure and spring application of liquid swine manure, all applied to supply 120 kg N ha −1 . The magnitude of N 2 O loss, as measured from samples collected at the tile outlets, demonstrated significant episodic emissions. Annual cumulative dissolved N 2 O emissions ranged from 0.1 to 5.69 kg N ha −1 (mean 0.83 kg N ha −1 ), while emissions from the soil surface were 0.09–1.16 kg N ha −1 (mean 0.33 kg N ha −1 ). N 2 O emissions in tile water were not significantly affected by the form of N applied, however tile drain length significantly impacted tile water N 2 O concentration. IPCC coefficients for N 2 O emissions from agricultural drainage water would underestimate actual N 2 O emissions at this site.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.191
Threshold uncertainty score0.637

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.001
GPT teacher head0.171
Teacher spread0.169 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2024
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrontiers in Environmental ScienceSame topicSoil and Water Nutrient DynamicsFrench-language works237,207