P-11 REAL-WORLD DATA WITH PANGENOTYPIC DIRECT-ACTING ANTIVIRALS IN LATINAMERICA: PRELIMINARY RESULTS OF THE SVR10K STUDY
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Yes, Gilead-sponsored research A previous real-world data (RWD) analysis demonstrated high effectiveness of sofosbuvir/velpatasvir (SOF/VEL) without ribavirin in > 6,000 HCV patients from 12 clinical cohorts across Australia, Canada, Europe & USA. Expand this research initiative with the ongoing SVR10K study, to include even more patients from additional geographical areas, which will allow to show SOF/VEL effectiveness across multiple diverse populations, including Latin-American (LATAM) region. This RWD analysis includes patients ≥ 18 years treated with SOF/VEL without RBV for 12 weeks, as decided by the treating HCP, from 13 sites across Brazil, Colombia, Hong Kong, Mexico, Singapore, Sweden, Spain, Taiwan, and the United Arab Emirates. Age, sex, treatment experienced (TE), cirrhosis stage (no decompensated included), genotype, coinfections, time to treatment initiation (TTI) from HCV diagnosis, and SVR were analyzed for LATAM region. Overall, 7,027 patients have been included up to now, 13% (n=890) of them from four sites in the LATAM region (Table). There, median age was 54.5 [IQR 43.2-63.5], where males 51%, and age > 50 years in 62%. Genotype 3 was present in 14%, cirrhotic (CC) 34%, TE 8%, while HIV, HBV and HDV coinfection was reported in 7.2%, 0.3%, and 0.0%, respectively. The TTI was available in 94%, with 28% having ≤30 days (In Brazil 57%). In terms of effectiveness, SVR was achieved in 99.6% of the treated population (n=788); being 98.2% in GT3 patients (n=112), 99.6% in CC patients (n=279), and 97.4% in GT3 CC patients (n=38). Results on treatment effectiveness in LATAM region did not differ from RWD studies of patients in the North-Western countries, reinforcing that HCV treatment guidelines are globally applicable, and supporting the efficacy of panfibrotic, pangenotypic, and pangeographic DAA therapy. Although with positive signs, there is still a significant room for improvement in the time to treatment initiation in the LATAM region.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".