Elemental stoichiometry and insect chill tolerance: evolved and plastic changes in organismal Na+ and K+ content in <i>Drosophila</i>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Acclimation and evolutionary adaptation can produce phenotypic changes that allow organisms to cope with challenges. Determining the relative contributions and the underlying mechanisms driving phenotypic shifts from acclimation and adaptation is of central importance to understanding animal responses to change. Rates of evolution have traditionally been considered slow relative to ecological processes that shape biodiversity. Many organisms nonetheless show patterns of genetic variation that suggest that adaptation may act sufficiently fast to allow continuous change in phenotypes in response to environmental change (called 'adaptive tracking'). In Drosophila, both plastic and evolved differences in chill tolerance are associated with ionoregulation. Here, we combine an acclimation experiment, field collections along a well-characterized latitudinal cline, and a replicated field experiment to assess the concordance in the direction, magnitude, and potential mechanisms of acclimation and adaptation on chill coma recovery and elemental (Na and K) stoichiometry in both sexes of Drosophila melanogaster. Acclimation strongly shaped chill coma recovery, spatial adaptation produced comparatively modest effects, and temporal adaptation had no significant effect. Leveraging knowledge on the mechanisms underlying variation in chill tolerance traits, we find that relationships between elemental stoichiometry and chill coma recovery in the context of acclimation may differ from those that are associated with spatial adaptive change.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".