MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

To Lump or to Split? Revision of <i>Cuscuta</i> section <i>Indecorae</i> Using a Combined Morphometric, Phylogenetic, and Host Range Approach

2024· article· en· W4405125084 on OpenAlexaff
Corey W. Burt, Saša Stefanović, Christopher Fleet, Mihai Costea

Bibliographic record

VenueSystematic Botany · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant Parasitism and Resistance
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoWilfrid Laurier University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiologyPhylogenetic treeCuscutaSection (typography)Range (aeronautics)Host (biology)BotanyEvolutionary biologyEcologyComputer scienceEngineeringGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract— Cuscuta section Indecorae is an infrageneric clade of Cuscuta subgenus Grammica that originated in North America which includes three species: C. indecora , C. coryli , and C. warneri . Some forms of C. indecora are agricultural weeds, while C. warneri and C. coryli face conservation problems regionally or globally. Cuscuta indecora is a morphologically diverse species with three recognized varieties: C. indecora var. indecora , C. indecora var. longisepala , and C. indecora var. attenuata . Two recent broad-scale molecular phylogenetic studies raised questions about the circumscription of C. indecora and the validity of its infraspecific taxa. Therefore, we conducted an extensive morphometric study, and used DNA sequences from plastid and nuclear ribosomal non-coding regions to reconstruct evolutionary relationships among taxa. In addition, we studied the host range of all taxa using herbarium specimens, bipartite networks, and Venn diagrams. Results from all types of evidence confirmed the circumscription of the three species, but differed on the infraspecific structure of C. indecora . The molecular phylogeny inferred C. indecora as paraphyletic, consisting of two distinct clades, with C. coryli nested within one of them. The morphometric and host range studies uncovered extensive overlaps both among the traditional varieties of C. indecora as well as between the two molecular lineages of C. indecora . Previously, Iva annua had been considered the sole host of C. indecora var. attenuata ( C. attenuata ) and this presumed host specificity was the main criterion for accepting this taxon. We found that the type of C. indecora var. longisepala was also growing on Iva annua , which together with the morphological and genetical similarity, indicates that C. indecora var. attenuata is identical to C. indecora var. longisepala . Overall, considering the lack of morphological, host range, and geographical patterns distinguishing either the current three varieties of C. indecora or the two cryptic lineages, the most appropriate solution is to tentatively recognize C . indecora as variable species without recognizing any infraspecific taxa.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.904
Threshold uncertainty score0.252

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSystematic BotanySame topicPlant Parasitism and ResistanceFrench-language works237,207