MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4405131777 · doi:10.1021/acsnano.4c10392

Switchable Photovoltaic Effect Induced by Light Intensity

2024· article· en· W4405131777 on OpenAlexafffund
Amin Abnavi, Ribwar Ahmadi, Hamidreza Ghanbari, Deji Akinwande, Michael M. Adachi

Bibliographic record

VenueACS Nano · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
Topic2D Materials and Applications
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
FundersWestern Economic Diversification CanadaNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaBritish Columbia Knowledge Development FundSimon Fraser UniversityCanada Foundation for Innovation
KeywordsOptoelectronicsMaterials sciencePolarity (international relations)Photovoltaic systemPhotodiodeLight intensityPhotovoltaic effectSchottky barrierSchottky diodeModulation (music)RayWavelengthOpticsChemistryPhysicsElectrical engineeringDiode

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Photovoltaic devices capable of reversible photovoltaic polarity through external signal modulation may enable multifunctional optoelectronic systems. However, such devices are limited to those induced by gate voltage, electrical poling, or optical wavelength by using complicated device architectures. Here, we show that the photovoltaic polarity is also switchable with the intensity of incident light. The modulation in light intensity induces photovoltaic polarity switching in geometrically asymmetric MoS 2 Schottky photodiodes, explained by the asymmetric lowering of the Schottky barrier heights due to the trapping of photogenerated holes at the MoS 2 /Cr interface states. An applied gate voltage can further modulate the carrier concentration in the MoS 2 channel, providing a method to tune the threshold light intensity of polarity switching. Finally, a bidirectional optoelectronic logic gate with “AND” and “OR” functions was demonstrated within a single device.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.034
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations20
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueACS NanoSame topic2D Materials and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207