Optimizing travel costs of feeder-integrated public transport system: A methodology
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Canada, with a substantial contribution from the personal transport sector, is a major per capita greenhouse gas emitter. This study advocates a sustainable 3-echelon transportation system, integrating Public Transit (PuT) and demand-responsive transit (DRT) for door-to-door service. Electric autonomous DRT vehicles serve the first and third legs of travel, while the second leg relies on PuT. The goal is to identify routes for commuters simultaneously optimizing user, operator, and emission costs. A novel evolutionary algorithm , guided by fuzzy inference systems, optimizes travel costs. The algorithm is calibrated, and its performance is validated against benchmark instances. The proposed optimization framework demonstrates superior performance, achieving quick convergence even for large instances with over 5,000 billion possible routes. Near-optimal routing solutions for sizable scenarios with approximately 100 commuters, 250 PuT nodes, and 50 DRT vehicles can be computed within approximately 20 min.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it