MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4405156178 · doi:10.1002/nbm.5296

Single‐Frequency Birdcage Coils for Deep Tissue Perfluorocarbon Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Mice

2024· article· en· W4405156178 on OpenAlexafffund
Sean W. McRae, Francisco M. Martínez, Paula J. Foster, John A. Ronald, Timothy J. Scholl

Bibliographic record

VenueNMR in Biomedicine · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAdvanced MRI Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsSt Joseph's Health CareOntario Institute for Cancer ResearchLawson Health Research InstituteWestern University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsElectromagnetic coilRadiofrequency coilMagnetic resonance imagingIn vivoImaging phantomNuclear magnetic resonanceRadio frequencyMaterials scienceEx vivoHomogeneity (statistics)ScannerBiomedical engineeringChemistryNuclear medicinePhysicsOpticsMedicineRadiologyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT Fluorine‐19 ( 19 F) MRI has become an established tool for in vivo cell tracking following ex vivo or in vivo labelling of various cell types with 19 F perfluorocarbons (PFCs). Here, we developed and evaluated novel mouse‐specific radiofrequency (RF) hardware for improved dual 1 H anatomical imaging and deep tissue 19 F MR detection of PFCs. Three linearly polarized birdcage RF coils were constructed—a dual‐frequency 1 H/ 19 F coil, and a pair of single‐frequency 1 H and 19 F coils, designed to be used sequentially. RF coil quality factors ( Q values ), signal homogeneity and sensitivity were benchmarked against a commercially constructed dual‐frequency 1 H/ 19 F surface coil. RF homogeneity was assessed using a phantom designed to mimic PFC localization at depth in a mouse. The single‐frequency birdcage coils ( 1 H and 19 F) displayed more uniform coverage and enhanced signal‐to‐noise ratios (SNRs) compared to both the birdcage and surface dual‐frequency coils for 19 F detection. Bilateral injection of a perfluoropolyether nanoemulsion into the footpads of female athymic nude mice, resulting in drainage to various lymph nodes and subsequent accumulation in lymph node macrophages, provided a platform to assess differences in SNRs and contrast‐to‐noise ratios (CNR) between both coil configurations as a function of depth and location. The single‐frequency 1 H coil provided significantly increased CNR in anatomical images ( p < 0.001) with increased anatomical coverage compared to the dual‐frequency surface coil. The single‐frequency 19 F birdcage coil offered increased PFC detectability with significantly higher SNR in renal, lumbar, sciatic and popliteal lymph nodes ( p < 0.01) compared to the dual‐frequency surface coil. Interestingly, the percentage difference between SNR measurements in lymph nodes between the single‐frequency 19 F coil and the 1 H/ 19 F surface coil had a linear relationship with increasing distance from the surface coil ( R 2 = 0.6352; p < 0.0001), indicating a potential disagreement for imaging experiments that rely on 19 F spin quantification at increasing depth within the mouse using surface RF coils.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.825
Threshold uncertainty score0.655

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.325
Teacher spread0.310 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNMR in BiomedicineSame topicAdvanced MRI Techniques and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207