Reward of tactile genital stimulation is sexually equivalent, but mechanistically differentiated in mice
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Gonadal steroid hormones are thought to activate sexual behavior by actions on multiple organ systems, including the nervous system and genitalia. We previously characterized ovarian hormone dependent behavioral and neural responses to clitoral stimulation in female mice. Here we investigate whether sex differences exist in the responses to tactile genital stimulation, and whether these might depend on gonadal androgens. We measured conditioned place preference (CPP) in response to manual tactile stimulation of either the prepuce or dorsum and subsequently measured neural activation. Behavioral and neural responses to genital stimulation were sexually equivalent in gonadally intact mice, with males exhibiting CPP and neural activation responses similar to those previously reported in females, with the exception of the Arcuate nucleus, which was activated to a greater extent in females. An unexpected sex difference in response to dorsal stimulation was observed, with only males developing CPP and increased FOS expression in the nucleus accumbens. Unlike females, the reward value of tactile stimulation was unaffected by gonadectomy in males. However, neural responses to tactile stimulation were disrupted by gonadectomy in both sexes. Testosterone treatment was only partially effective in restoring neural responses to genital stimulation and did so in a sexually diffentiated manner. We conclude that behavioral and neural responses of sexually-naïve mice to genital stimulation are largely similar between males and females, but that non-genital tactile stimulation is more reinforcing to males. Further, the relationship between gonadal steroid hormones and genital reward is sexually differentiated. • Reward and neural response to genital stimulation were sexually equivalent in gonadally-intact mice, but reward to dorsal stimulation was only observed in males • Unlike females, gonadectomy did not prevent genital reward in males, but disrupted neural responses of both sexes • Testosterone treatment was only partially effective in restoring neural responses to genital stimulation, and did so in a sexually differentiated manner. • Gonadectomy did not prevent reward of dorsal stimulation to males, but did prevent neural responses, which testosterone treatment partially restored
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".