MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Abstract A003: In vitro anticancer activities of some organoplatinum (IV) derivatives

2024· article· en· W4405170886 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
William A. Howard

Bibliographic record

VenueMolecular Cancer Therapeutics · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMetal complexes synthesis and properties
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIn vitroChemistryPharmacologyCombinatorial chemistryStereochemistryBiologyBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Recent investigations into organoplatinum (IV) complexes as potential anticancer agents have shown considerable promise. Unlike cisplatin, these compounds are more stable in physiological environments and generally exhibit fewer side effects. Additionally, chelating aromatic ancillary ligands have been found to enhance the intercalation of metal-based agents into tumor DNA. This study aimed to synthesize novel organoplatinum (IV) complexes with chelating aromatic ligands and evaluate their anticancer efficacy through in vitro assays. Five complexes were synthesized: [Pt(CH3)2X2{2,2’-bipyridine-4,4’-R2}] (X = Br, I; R = H, CO2H) and [{Pt(CH3)3}2(μ-I)2(μ-adenine)]. These were characterized by single crystal X-ray diffraction and assessed for anticancer activity. The MTT assays indicated that the [Pt(CH3)2X2{2,2’-bipyridine}] complexes were more cytotoxic to the ZR-75-1 human breast cancer cell line than cisplatin, with LC50 values of 6.1 µM for X = I, 11.5 µM for X = Br, compared to 16.4 µM for cisplatin. Furthermore, the sulforhodamine B assays conducted by the National Cancer Institute's Developmental Therapeutics Program revealed that [Pt(CH3)3}2(μ-I)2(μ-adenine)] was highly effective against various cancer cell lines. Notably, it showed an LC50 value of 5.20 µM against the glioblastoma multiforme SF-539 cell line, whereas cisplatin and temozolomide had LC50 values exceeding 100 µM. Similarly, [Pt(CH3)3}2(μ-I)2(μ-adenine)] had an LC50 value of 5.99 µM against the renal carcinoma RXF-393 cell line, with cisplatin and cabozantinib showing LC50 values above 100 µM. While these results highlight the superior cytotoxicity of the tested organoplatinum (IV) complexes, further research and development are required before these compounds can be considered for commercial use as chemotherapy drugs. Citation Format: William A. Howard. In vitro anticancer activities of some organoplatinum (IV) derivatives [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference in Cancer Research: Optimizing Therapeutic Efficacy and Tolerability through Cancer Chemistry; 2024 Dec 9-11; Toronto, Ontario, Canada. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Mol Cancer Ther 2024;23(12_Suppl):Abstract nr A003

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.043
Threshold uncertainty score0.570

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.049
GPT teacher head0.312
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMolecular Cancer TherapeuticsSame topicMetal complexes synthesis and propertiesFrench-language works237,207