MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4405177038 · doi:10.22603/ssrr.2024-0223

The Clinical Impact of Augmented Reality Surgical Navigation on Pedicle Screw Placement and its Effect on Perioperative Outcomes: A Systematic Review

2024· review· en· W4405177038 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Charles Taylor, N Manoj, Omkaar Divekar

Bibliographic record

VenueSpine Surgery and Related Research · 2024
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSpinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPerioperativeAugmented realityMedicineComputer scienceSurgeryHuman–computer interaction

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Spinal fusion is a common form of orthopedic surgery, the most common of which involves pedicle screw placement (PSP). Despite well-documented benefits, pedicle screws are associated with several intraoperative complications. This area of surgery has subsequently been recipient to many surgical developments. Currently, augmented reality surgical navigation (ARSN) is at the forefront of surgical interest. This systematic review evaluates whether, when compared to freehand, fluoroscopic, and intraoperative image-guided navigation, ARSN results in superior screw accuracy and operative outcomes for patients undergoing PSP surgery. Methods: Data collection was performed on PubMed, Ovid MEDLINE, the Cochrane Library, Embase, and the Web of Science between January 7, 2023, and January 8, 2024. PRISMA guidelines were followed and the level of evidence was graded per the Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine's recommendations. Risk of bias was assessed per the ROBINS-I tool and the Cochrane guide for assessing study quality. A modified version of the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was used to determine the certainty of the body of evidence. Results: A total of 521 papers were obtained from all bibliographical databases, 31 of which were included in the final review. ARSN resulted in a significantly greater number of screws placed as Gertzbein and Robbins grade 1 or 2 (93.33% vs 85.86%, p<0.000), significantly reduced intraoperative blood loss (470.32 vs 802.44 ml, p=0.050), comparative operative duration (281.6 vs 255.5 min, p=0.819), comparative time to place a screw (2.71 vs 3.1 min, p=0.703), and a nonsignificant reduction in hospital stay (5.4 vs 7.5 days, p=0.097). Maximum follow-up was more than 14 days. Conclusions: ARSN results in a significantly greater number of screws placed at Gertzbein-Robertson grade 1 or 2 than non-ARSN surgery. Therefore, ARSN can be considered as a safe and efficacious technical innovation within PSP surgery.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.037
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: Systematic review
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.038

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.037
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0090.010
Bibliometrics0.0080.009
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.170
GPT teacher head0.564
Teacher spread0.394 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSystematic review
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSpine Surgery and Related ResearchSame topicSpinal Fractures and Fixation TechniquesFrench-language works237,207