MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4405179979 · doi:10.33137/rr.v47i3.44473

Campbell, Julie D. Women, Entertainment, and Precursors of the French Salon, 1532–1615

2024· article· en· W4405179979 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Dijana O. Apostolski

Bibliographic record

VenueRenaissance and Reformation · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistorical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSalonEntertainmentArtArt historyVisual arts

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Conventional histories of seventeenth-century French salon society trace the movement's beginnings to Catherine de Vivonne's (1599-1665) gatherings of the select précieuses in her chambre bleue at the Hôtel de Rambouillet in Paris.According to these interpretations, the marquise de Rambouillet's chambre bleue was an originary site where the nascent French salon culture, social politesse, and modern novel came to fruition, breaking with outdated traditions and "the barbarousness of the Bourbon court" (66).Julie D. Campbell reminds us of L. Clark Keating's 1941 exemplar study in which he argues that, in his words, "the salon of Mme de Rambouillet was not an outgrowth of, but a protest against, the sixteenth-century society which she saw round about her" (19).Women, Entertainment, and Precursors of the French Salon, 1532-1651 disrupts the established historical metanarratives that maintain the abrupt and reactive "birth" of the seventeenth-century French salon.The volume follows the history of the French salon to the sixteenth-century Valois courts and sodalities of Lyon, Poitiers, and Toulouse that had strong connections to the Italian literary society, unravelling Italianate literary games, court conventions, and humanist salon-style society as the French salon's precursors.Campbell writes that, "while such seventeenth-century groups may have broken with the Bourbon court, there was no perfectly clean break with social practices of the sixteenth-century société mondaine […] it is crucial to remember that such groups […] had rich Italian roots" (19).Campbell uses theories and histories of play, including the works of Johan Huizinga, Eugen Fink, Roger Caillois, and Bernard Suits, to frame the close readings of primary sources related to the sixteenth-century "proto salons, " including manuscript albums, printed texts, and the writings of Estienne Pasquier (1529-1615).Given that Pasquier was involved in proto-salon culture and the circles of the Dames des Roches, Madeleine (c.1520-87) and Catherine (1542-87), and Marguerite de Valois (1553-1615), Campbell uses Pasquier's copious letters, poetry, and texts as a ficelle (a string) between play and culture, specifying Pasquier as the eyewitness of the shaping of early salon-style entertainment (22).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.300
Threshold uncertainty score0.596

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0090.006
Scholarly communication0.0050.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.201
Teacher spread0.190 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRenaissance and ReformationSame topicHistorical Studies and Socio-cultural AnalysisFrench-language works237,207