Campbell, Julie D. Women, Entertainment, and Precursors of the French Salon, 1532–1615
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Conventional histories of seventeenth-century French salon society trace the movement's beginnings to Catherine de Vivonne's (1599-1665) gatherings of the select précieuses in her chambre bleue at the Hôtel de Rambouillet in Paris.According to these interpretations, the marquise de Rambouillet's chambre bleue was an originary site where the nascent French salon culture, social politesse, and modern novel came to fruition, breaking with outdated traditions and "the barbarousness of the Bourbon court" (66).Julie D. Campbell reminds us of L. Clark Keating's 1941 exemplar study in which he argues that, in his words, "the salon of Mme de Rambouillet was not an outgrowth of, but a protest against, the sixteenth-century society which she saw round about her" (19).Women, Entertainment, and Precursors of the French Salon, 1532-1651 disrupts the established historical metanarratives that maintain the abrupt and reactive "birth" of the seventeenth-century French salon.The volume follows the history of the French salon to the sixteenth-century Valois courts and sodalities of Lyon, Poitiers, and Toulouse that had strong connections to the Italian literary society, unravelling Italianate literary games, court conventions, and humanist salon-style society as the French salon's precursors.Campbell writes that, "while such seventeenth-century groups may have broken with the Bourbon court, there was no perfectly clean break with social practices of the sixteenth-century société mondaine […] it is crucial to remember that such groups […] had rich Italian roots" (19).Campbell uses theories and histories of play, including the works of Johan Huizinga, Eugen Fink, Roger Caillois, and Bernard Suits, to frame the close readings of primary sources related to the sixteenth-century "proto salons, " including manuscript albums, printed texts, and the writings of Estienne Pasquier (1529-1615).Given that Pasquier was involved in proto-salon culture and the circles of the Dames des Roches, Madeleine (c.1520-87) and Catherine (1542-87), and Marguerite de Valois (1553-1615), Campbell uses Pasquier's copious letters, poetry, and texts as a ficelle (a string) between play and culture, specifying Pasquier as the eyewitness of the shaping of early salon-style entertainment (22).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.009 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".