MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Abstract A014: OICR41103: a chemical probe for investigating DCAF1 function and therapeutic potential

2024· article· en· W4405181185 on OpenAlexaffabout
Mahmoud Noureldin, Serah Kimani, Brian C. Wilson, Levon Halabelian, Rima Al‐awar

Bibliographic record

VenueMolecular Cancer Therapeutics · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicProtein Degradation and Inhibitors
Canadian institutionsStructural Genomics ConsortiumOntario Institute for Cancer Research
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFunction (biology)CancerChemistryComputational biologyBiologyCell biologyGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract DCAF1 is a multifunctional protein that plays an important role in cellular processes, including protein degradation, cell cycle regulation, and immune function, by serving as a substrate receptor for RING-type CRL4 and the HECT family EDVP E3 ubiquitin ligases. Due to its involvement in various biological pathways and diseases, such as cancer and viral infections, there is a growing need for tools to study and regulate DCAF1 functions. Building upon our previous discovery of OICR-38268, a small-molecule binder of the DCAF1 WD40 domain, we have developed an improved chemical probe, OICR-41103. This compound exhibits enhanced binding affinity and selectivity for the WD40 domain of DCAF1. We successfully crystallized OICR-41103 with the WD40 domain, revealing its binding mode. Our probe binds to the WD40 domain of DCAF1 with a low nanomolar affinity in biophysical assays, and engages this domain in cells at nanomolar concentrations. This work presents a valuable chemical probe for studying DCAF1 function and provides a foundation for future drug discovery efforts, either by directly targeting DCAF1 or leveraging it for PROTAC-based strategies Citation Format: Mahmoud Noureldin, Serah Kimani, Brian Wilson, Levon Halabelian, Rima Al-awar. OICR41103: a chemical probe for investigating DCAF1 function and therapeutic potential. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference in Cancer Research: Optimizing Therapeutic Efficacy and Tolerability through Cancer Chemistry; 2024 Dec 9-11; Toronto, Ontario, Canada. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Mol Cancer Ther 2024;23(12_Suppl):Abstract nr A014

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.044

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0130.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.277
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMolecular Cancer TherapeuticsSame topicProtein Degradation and InhibitorsFrench-language works237,207