MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4405182004 · doi:10.1016/j.agee.2024.109423

Environmental phosphorus risk classes for silage corn in the Fraser Valley, Canada

2024· article· en· W4405182004 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Sylvia Nyamaizi, Aimé J. Messiga, Barbara J. Cade‐Menun, Jean‐Thomas Cornelis, Sean Smukler

Bibliographic record

VenueAgriculture Ecosystems & Environment · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicSoil and Water Nutrient Dynamics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British ColumbiaAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada
FundersAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada
KeywordsSilagePhosphorusEnvironmental scienceAgronomyBiologyChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

High soil phosphorus (P) concentrations accelerate P losses from intensively managed farmlands and must be reduced to mitigate eutrophication and water quality concerns, without reducing crop yields. Using 140 soil samples from silage corn fields within the Fraser Valley, British Columbia, Canada, water-extractable P (Pw) was positively related to the P saturation index (PSI) by linear regression (R 2 = 0.89). We established critical values for PSI 10.8 % and Pw 4.1 mg kg –1 for P loss risks and identified four environmental risk classes. Soils in the low risk class (PSI = 0–6.6 %, Pw = 0–2.2 mg kg –1 ), had the lowest Mehlich 3-P (P M3 ) concentrations, but yield was 13.7 Mg ha –1 , below the optimum provincial range (20–25 Mg ha –1 ). In the moderate risk class (PSI = 6.6–10.8 %, Pw = 2.2–4.1 mg kg –1 ), soil P was sufficient to achieve optimum silage corn yield (22.2 Mg ha –1 ). Conversely, in the high (PSI = 10.8–24.3 %; Pw = 4.1–10.3 mg kg –1 ) and very high (PSI > 24.3 % and Pw > 10.3 mg kg –1 ) risk classes, soils had excessive P concentrations (P M3 > 200 mg kg –1 ), but corn yield did not increase. Soil P must be reduced in the high and very high risk classes to reduce runoff loss risk, which will not affect crop yields. Our study shows that P fertilization could improve yields in the low risk class, but must be done carefully to minimize the likelihood of P loss risks.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.672
Threshold uncertainty score0.917

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.160
Teacher spread0.156 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2024
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAgriculture Ecosystems & EnvironmentSame topicSoil and Water Nutrient DynamicsFrench-language works237,207