MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Abstract A011: Discovery and characterization of the first highly potent and selective AXL receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor AB801

2024· article· en· W4405182172 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Dillon H. Miles, Corinne N. Foley, Shiwei Qu, Srinivas Reddy Paladugu, Ehesan U. Sharif, Joice Thomas, Pradeep Nareddy, Rebecca L. Grange, Manmohan R. Leleti, Jay P. Powers, Stefan Garrido-Shaqfeh, Ada Chen, Hema Singh, Yue Tong Lee, Xiaoning Zhao, David A. Green, Hsin‐Ting Huang, Lixia Jin, Jhansi L. Leslie, Susan L. Paprcka, Ester Fernández‐Salas

Bibliographic record

VenueMolecular Cancer Therapeutics · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicPhagocytosis and Immune Regulation
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGAS6KinomeMERTKCancer researchReceptor tyrosine kinaseCancerCancer cellAXL receptor tyrosine kinaseTyrosine kinaseKinaseTumor microenvironmentPharmacologyTyrosine-kinase inhibitorImmune checkpointImmune systemBiologySignal transductionChemistryImmunotherapyCell biologyImmunologyJAK-STAT signaling pathway

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The AXL receptor (AXL) is a transmembrane protein that is highly expressed in a variety of tumors and correlates with poor prognosis in cancer patients. AXL is expressed in cancer, immune, and stromal cells and has been implicated in the development of resistance to chemotherapy, targeted therapies, and immunotherapies. Activation of AXL by either its ligand, growth arrest specific protein 6 (GAS6), or ligand-independent homo- and hetero-dimerization facilitates AXL phosphorylation and initiates signaling cascades that promote cancer cell proliferation, survival, and an immunosuppressive microenvironment. Historically, most small-molecule inhibitors capable of suppressing AXL signaling are unselective and inhibit several other related kinases. Administration of a truly selective AXL inhibitor would be expected to be free of the off-target toxicity of other kinase inhibitors; this, in turn, might allow the unmasking of the full therapeutic benefit associated with robust AXL inhibition. To this end, we initiated a medicinal chemistry campaign with additional goals of discovering a potent and orally bioavailable inhibitor. Through iterative SAR-guided design we discovered AB801, a reversible AXL inhibitor. Importantly, AB801 exhibits excellent selectivity against MERTK, TYRO3 (closely related tyrosine kinases) and the overall kinome. AB801 exhibits a double-digit picomolar inhibitory constant and retains significant activity in cell-based assays performed in 100% human serum. In vitro, AB801 increases sensitivity to standard of care (SOC) therapeutics such as chemotherapy and results in increased DNA damage, leading to cancer cell death. AB801 treatment also sensitizes tumors to immune checkpoint blockade by increasing immune cell activation. Significant anti-tumor efficacy is observed in combination with SOC therapies in multiple in vivo models. When compared against existing AXL inhibitors such as bemcentinib, AB801 shows large improvements in both potency and selectivity. A placebo-controlled phase 1 study (NCT06004921) to assess the safety and pharmacokinetics of AB801 in healthy volunteers was recently completed; AB801 was well tolerated at all tested doses and exhibited a dose-proportionate increase in exposure. Currently, AB801 is in clinical evaluation in patients with advanced cancer (NCT06120075). Citation Format: Dillon H. Miles, Corinne N. Foley, Shiwei Qu, Dillon H. Miles, Srinivas Paladugu, Ehesan U. Sharif, Joice Thomas, Pradeep Nareddy, Guiling Zhao, Rebecca Grange, Manmohan R. Leleti, Jay P. Powers, Stefan Garrido-Shaqfeh, Ada Chen, Hema Singh, Yue Tong Lee, Xiaoning Zhao, David Green, Hsin-Ting Huang, Lixia Jin, Jhansi Leslie, Logan Chinn, Susan L Paprcka, Ester Fernandez-Salas. Discovery and characterization of the first highly potent and selective AXL receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor AB801 [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference in Cancer Research: Optimizing Therapeutic Efficacy and Tolerability through Cancer Chemistry; 2024 Dec 9-11; Toronto, Ontario, Canada. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Mol Cancer Ther 2024;23(12_Suppl):Abstract nr A011.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMolecular Cancer TherapeuticsSame topicPhagocytosis and Immune RegulationFrench-language works237,207