MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4405184912 · doi:10.3390/vetsci11120631

Frequency of Bovine Respiratory Disease Complex Bacterial and Viral Agents Using Multiplex Real-Time qPCR in Quebec, Canada, from 2019 to 2023

2024· article· en· W4405184912 on OpenAlexaffabout
Sébastien Buczinski, André Broes, Christian Savard

Bibliographic record

VenueVeterinary Sciences · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicMicrobial infections and disease research
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMultiplexBovine respiratory diseaseVirologyBiologyReal-time polymerase chain reactionMicrobiologyBioinformaticsGeneticsGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The bovine respiratory disease complex (BRD) is a multifactorial disease caused by various bacterial and viral pathogens. Using rapid pathogen detection techniques is helpful for tailoring therapeutic and preventive strategies in affected animals and herds. The objective of this study was to report the frequency of 10 pathogens by multiplex RT-qPCR on samples submitted for BRD diagnosis to a diagnostic laboratory (Biovet Inc., QC, Canada) in the Province of Quebec, Eastern Canada. From the 1st of January 2019 to the 31st of December 2023, a total of 1875 samples were analyzed. Most samples collected were individual samples (1547 of 1860 samples for which information was available (83.17%)), and the rest were from pooled samples of 2 (8.55%, n = 159) or ≥3 specimens (8.28%, n = 154). In 19.3% of the samples (n = 362), no pathogen was found, whereas 54.1% of samples had two or more different pathogens. Among the viruses, bovine coronavirus (BCV) was the most commonly found (27.5% of samples, n = 516), followed by bovine respiratory syncytial virus (BRSV) (17.7%, n = 332), whereas, for bacteria, Pasteurella multocida (50.1%, n = 940) and Mannheimia haemolytica (26.9%, n = 505) were the most common. The frequency of samples positive for Histophilus somni, Mycoplasmopsis bovis, influenza type D virus (IDV), bovine parainfluenza virus type 3 (BPI3V), bovine herpesvirus type 1 (BHV1), and bovine viral diarrhea virus (BVDV) was 22.6%, 22.4%, 4.6%, 4.3%, 2.7%, and 0.9%, respectively. In the multivariable Poisson regression model, the total number of pathogens increased with the number of animals in the pool, with an incidence risk ratio (IRR) of 1.15 (95% CI 1.02–1.29) and 1.32 (1.18–1.47) for 2 individuals in the pool and ≥3 individuals vs. individual samples, respectively. An increased number of pathogens were isolated in the winter season (IRR = 1.28 (95% CI 1.17–1.40)) compared to fall, and a lower number of pathogens were isolated in the summer compared to fall (IRR = 0.82 (95% CI 0.73–0.92)). These seasonal differences were mostly driven by the number of viruses isolated. This study gives interesting insights on the circulation of BRD pathogens in cattle from Eastern Canada.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.025
Threshold uncertainty score0.180

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.063
GPT teacher head0.326
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueVeterinary SciencesSame topicMicrobial infections and disease researchFrench-language works237,207