Quadratic quantum speedup for perceptron training
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Perceptrons, which perform binary classification, are the fundamental building blocks of neural networks. Given a data set of size $N$ and margin $\ensuremath{\gamma}$ (how well the given data are separated), the query complexity of the best-known quantum training algorithm scales as either $(\sqrt{N}/{\ensuremath{\gamma}}^{2})log(1/{\ensuremath{\gamma}}^{2})$ or $N/\sqrt{\ensuremath{\gamma}}$, which is achieved by a hybrid of classical and quantum search. In this paper, we improve the version space quantum training method for perceptrons such that the query complexity of our algorithm scales as $\sqrt{N/\ensuremath{\gamma}}$. This is achieved by constructing an oracle for the perceptrons using quantum counting of the number of data elements that are correctly classified. Once such an oracle is constructed, bounded-error quantum search can be used to search over the hyperplane instances. The optimality of our algorithm is proven by reducing the evaluation of a two-level and-or tree (for which the query complexity lower bound is known) to a multicriterion search. Our quantum training algorithm can be generalized to train more complex machine learning models such as neural networks, which are built on a large number of perceptrons.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".