Prediagnostic Plasma Nutrimetabolomics and Prostate Cancer Risk: A Nested Case–Control Analysis Within the EPIC Study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background and Objective: Nutrimetabolomics may reveal novel insights into early metabolic alterations and the role of dietary exposures on prostate cancer (PCa) risk. We aimed to prospectively investigate the associations between plasma metabolite concentrations and PCa risk, including clinically relevant tumor subtypes. Methods: We used a targeted and large-scale metabolomics approach to analyze plasma samples of 851 matched PCa case–control pairs from the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC) cohort. Associations between metabolite concentrations and PCa risk were estimated by multivariate conditional logistic regression analysis. False discovery rate (FDR) was used to control for multiple testing correction. Results: Thirty-one metabolites (predominately derivatives of food intake and microbial metabolism) were associated with overall PCa risk and its clinical subtypes (p < 0.05), but none of the associations exceeded the FDR threshold. The strongest positive and negative associations were for dimethylglycine (OR = 2.13; 95% CI 1.16–3.91) with advanced PCa risk (n = 157) and indole-3-lactic acid (OR = 0.28; 95% CI 0.09–0.87) with fatal PCa risk (n = 57), respectively; however, these associations did not survive correction for multiple testing. Conclusions: The results from the current nutrimetabolomics study suggest that apart from early metabolic deregulations, some biomarkers of food intake might be related to PCa risk, especially advanced and fatal PCa. Further independent and larger studies are needed to validate our results.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".