MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4405194679 · doi:10.1002/prp2.70045

Teneurin C‐Terminal Associated Peptide (<scp>TCAP</scp>)‐1 Attenuates Restraint Stress‐Induced Corticosterone Increases in Male Mice and Rats

2024· article· en· W4405194679 on OpenAlexaff
Lutz Mueller, Roseanne S. Wexler, David A. Lovejoy, Robert B. Stein, Andrew Slee

Bibliographic record

VenuePharmacology Research & Perspectives · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicStress Responses and Cortisol
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCorticosteroneTerminal (telecommunication)PeptideMedicineInternal medicineEndocrinologyPharmacologyBiologyComputer scienceHormoneBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Hyperactivation of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis response can result in anxiety and other neuropsychiatric disorders and effective therapeutics are needed to mitigate this maladaptive response. Here we examined the effects of Teneurin C-terminal Associated Peptide (TCAP)-1, a peptide known to inhibit corticotropin releasing factor (CRF)-mediated stress, on the physiological expression of stress, and whether the effects of TCAP-1 were dependent on the route of administration. We first examined whether subcutaneous administration of TCAP-1 influenced tube restraint stress-induced corticosterone (CORT) increases in both male mice and rats. Using a similar model, we further examined the efficacy and time course of intranasal TCAP-1. Results showed that subcutaneous TCAP-1 administration attenuated the expression of the physiological manifestation of stress in male mice and rats, and that intranasal TCAP-1 delivered prophylactically is effective at attenuating stress-induced CORT increases in male rats. These data indicate that TCAP-1 delivered though non-invasive routes of administration could have potential as a clinically relevant anxiolytic.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.250
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.089
GPT teacher head0.409
Teacher spread0.319 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePharmacology Research & PerspectivesSame topicStress Responses and CortisolFrench-language works237,207