MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4405195918 · doi:10.1002/agt2.702

Stable Hydrogen‐Bonded Cobalt‐porphyrin Framework for High‐Performance Electrochemical Detection of Carcinoembryonic Antigen

2024· article· en· W4405195918 on OpenAlexaff
Youfa Wang, Jie Han, Geoffrey I. N. Waterhouse, Hui‐Wen Gu, Rui Wang, Shuang Wu, Pengfei Dong, Vijaya Raghavan, Jin Wang

Bibliographic record

VenueAggregate · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicAdvanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersFundamental Research Funds for the Central UniversitiesGovernment of Jiangsu ProvinceNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsCobaltCarcinoembryonic antigenPorphyrinElectrochemistryChemistryMaterials scienceInorganic chemistryPhotochemistryInternal medicineElectrodeMedicineCancerPhysical chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT The accurate and sensitive detection of low‐abundance cancer‐related biomarkers in blood remains a key technical challenge in clinical applications. Herein, a simple and accurate sandwich‐type electrochemical immunosensor based on a stable hydrogen‐bonded cobalt‐porphyrin framework (Co‐HOF) was successfully developed for the ultrasensitive detection of the cancer‐related biomarker, carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA). The antibody‐modified Co‐HOF forms a sandwich structure with the CEA aptamer electrode exclusively in the presence of CEA, enabling the specific electrochemical detection of CEA. The electrochemical signal increased linearly with the concentration of CEA, demonstrating a wide linear range (0.001–50 ng mL−1) and a low detection limit (0.22 pg mL−1), surpassing the performance of commercial ELISA kits and most reported detection methods. The sensor was successfully employed for CEA detection in spiked human serum, with recoveries ranging from 85.04% to 105.20%. Additionally, we collected blood samples from colorectal cancer patients and healthy individuals to clinically validate the sensor, observing that CEA levels increased with cancer progression. The sensor detection results showed strong consistency (R2 = 0.995) with those obtained from commercial ELISA kits, demonstrating the proposed sensor's practicality for clinical detection of CEA and related cancer biomarkers.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAggregateSame topicAdvanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniquesFrench-language works237,207