Evaluation of the outcomes of equity-deserving individuals receiving services and support from integrated substance use health and mental health services: a pilot study protocol
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: Given the close relationship that can exist between substance use health and mental health (SUHMH) concerns, the need for more integrated services and support has been identified. However, research on the effective integration of SUHMH services and their impact on outcomes of individuals accessing them remains limited. In particular, the unique outcomes of individuals facing significant structural inequities in the health care system, i.e., Indigenous Peoples in Canada, including First Nations, Inuit and Métis (FNIM), and equity-deserving (ED) groups, have not been evaluated while receiving integrated SUHMH services. This paper describes the protocol for a pilot research project, which will evaluate the change in clinical and social outcomes of individuals receiving integrated SUHMH services in relation to their intersectionality status, a linear score ranging from identifying with no FNIM and ED groups to identifying with one or multiple groups. Methods: This study recruits 100 individuals who receive SUHMH services and support from a community health center in Ottawa, Canada and assessed their FNIM and ED status and clinical and social outcomes at baseline and three-month follow-up. At the time of writing this manuscript, the baseline data collection was completed. Follow up assessment occurs three months after baseline data was collected. A smaller group of these participants will be purposefully selected match the proportion of FNIM and ED groups from the two-time assessment. They will be invited to participate in a post-data analysis validation consultation session to ensure that the findings are reflective of the experiences of individuals receiving SUHMH services, alternative interpretations are brought forward, and implications are driven by those who will be most impacted. This consultation may also inform knowledge mobilization activities and future studies. This study also recruited staff in different roles from the providing center to rate the implementation of key dimensions of equity-oriented care into their practices and their level and capability to provide integrated services and support to individuals with cooccurring substance use disorders and mental illnesses. Discussion: The results of this study will inform integrated SUHMH services by emphasizing equity and inclusive approaches, and engagement with the community. Substance use health; Mental health; Integrated services and support; Equity-deserving populations; Equity-oriented care.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.060 | 0.032 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.018 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".