Hydrothermal carbonization coating on recycled quartz glass fiber
Bibliographic record
Abstract
• Recycled quartz fiber with coating was tested for solar thermal evaporation. • Hydrothermal carbonization at 200 °C for 4 h created hydrochar on quartz wool. • Carbon coating thickness varied, enhancing solar absorption and water transport. • Carbon-coated quartz wool evaporated water 2.5 times faster than uncoated wool. Hydrothermal carbon derived from D-glucose was deposited on quartz fiber wool to enhance solar thermal evaporation. Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) indicated 46 % weight loss for the coated wool above 500 °C. The BET surface area of the coated wool was 6.8581 m 2 /g. The carbon at the outer surface fibers of the quartz wool was thicker. The steady-state solar thermal evaporation rate of the carbon-coated quartz wool was found to be 3.1831 kg/m 2 ∙h, which is 2.5 times higher than that of the uncoated one (0.8785 kg/m 2 ∙h).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".