Action observation and imitation: Corticospinal responses and hemispheric dominance
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The response of the motor neuron system to the observation of lateralized movements and expectation mismatches remains elusive. We investigated how observation of hand movement modulates corticospinal excitability as measured by motor evoked potentials to single pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). Twenty-seven adults watched a series of egocentric video recordings of hands, with one hand either squeezing a foam ball as expected or both hands remaining stationary. Task conditions comprised observation-only and observation with synchronous imitation of the depicted motor action. Single TMS pulses were delivered to the motor cortex contralateral to the dominant hand at the video frame of maximal hand closure for squeeze videos and randomly for no-squeeze videos (in both observation-only or observation with synchronous imitation). We analyzed MEPs, from the First Dorsal Interosseous (FDI) muscle of the dominant hand. Observation alone (absence of motor intention) did not enhance corticospinal excitability; however, when paired with imitation (presence of motor intention), it tended to increase MEP amplitudes, regardless of the attended side (dominant or non-dominant) or depicted action (squeeze or not). Among conditions in which the dominant hand remained stationary, MEP amplitudes were elevated (p = 0.004) in observation with imitation of non-dominant hand squeezing, suggesting hemispheric dominance in coordinating motor actions. Additionally, MEP latencies tended to decrease during synchronous imitation of squeeze videos. Our findings support the consideration of observation with synchronous imitation as a task for brain state-dependent brain stimulation protocols for optimizing neuromotor recovery.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".