MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4405225303 · doi:10.1139/cgj-2024-0201

Experimental study on multi-parameter performance differences of coal with different rockburst tendencies

2024· article· en· W4405225303 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Yanhui Li, Jianbiao Bai, Xiangyu Wang, Xiaoqing Wang, Xiangqian Zhao

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Geotechnical Journal · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicGeomechanics and Mining Engineering
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsGeotechnical engineeringCoalGeologyMining engineeringCoal miningForensic engineeringEnvironmental scienceEngineeringWaste management

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Addressing the difficult issue of precursor damage warning signs for the destruction of coal with different rockburst tendency, this paper conducted research on the multi-parameter evolution laws by acoustic-thermal-energy synchronization experiments. The results show that as rockburst tendency increases, uniaxial compressive strength (UCS), elastic strain energy density, energy ringing count, cumulative energy counts, and acoustic emission (AE) impact intensity all increase significantly; the post-peak stress–strain curve is gradually steeper and the impact damage is more severe than that because the denser structure accumulates more elastic energy, causing severe impact damage; moreover, the damage form gradually changes from shear to split damage, triggering the infrared radiation temperature changing from warming to cooling type. Disaster precursor signatures appear in each covariate, respectively, and a calm zone appears in the energy ringing counts of coal specimens with weak and strong rockburst tendency; as rockburst tendency increases, the b-value precursor signature points fall behind, being 87%, 95.3%, and 97.9% of the UCS, respectively; correspondingly, a calm period appears in the infrared radiant temperature, but lags behind the signals of AE and the UCS. There are differences in homologous monitoring information, mainly due to the different densification, strength, and damage form. This paper lays a foundation for rockburst prevention and control.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.217
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Geotechnical JournalSame topicGeomechanics and Mining EngineeringFrench-language works237,207