MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4405226662 · doi:10.24857/rgsa.v18n12-058

Zoning of Trace Metals Sediments, in the Lagoa do Carro-PE Dam, From TEL/ PEL and ERL/ ERM Parameters

2024· article· en· W4405226662 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Claudison Vieira de Albuquerque, A. M. Rochette Cordeiro, Luís Alcoforado

Bibliographic record

VenueRevista de Gestão Social e Ambiental · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicWater Quality and Pollution Assessment
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsZoningTRACE (psycholinguistics)GeologyGeochemistryEnvironmental scienceTrace elementMining engineeringArchaeologyGeographyPolitical scienceLawPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objective: The objective of this study is to analyze the presence of trace metals (Cd, Hg, Pb, Zn, Cr and Ni), using the TEL and PEL and ERL and ERM parameters of the Environmental Agencies of Canada and the United States, as well as CONAMA Resolution 357/05, in the bottom sediments of the Lagoa do Carro Dam, in the state of Pernambuco. Theoretical Framework: Considered one of the five largest water reservoirs in the state of Pernambuco, located in the Médio Capibaribe microbasin and responsible for supplying a population of approximately 300 thousand inhabitants in the municipalities of Carpina, Feira Nova, Glória do Goitá, Lagoa de Itaenga, Lagoa do Carro and Limoeiro. Method: The methodology adopted for this research includes obtaining the results using FUS-ICP (Fusion Inductively Coupled Plasma), where an oxidized sample is dissolved in a borate stream and then diluted in aqueous nitric acid; TD-ICP (Total Digestion Inductively Coupled Plasma and INAA (Instrumental Neutron Activation Analysis). Results and Discussion: The results obtained demonstrate that two of the metals analyzed are above those recommended by the WHO and pose risks to the dam's biota, as well as to users of the supply system. The numbers are well above acceptable limits, requiring urgent measures to maintain the status quo. Research Implications: The practical and theoretical implications of this research are discussed, providing insights into how the results can be applied or influence practices in the field of Geography and water reservoirs. Originality/Value: This study contributes to the literature by standing out for the originality of the research, whether through an innovative approach, new discoveries or practical contributions. The relevance and value of this research are evidenced by analyzing one of the five largest water reservoirs in the state of Pernambuco.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.605
Threshold uncertainty score0.477

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.292
Teacher spread0.269 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevista de Gestão Social e AmbientalSame topicWater Quality and Pollution AssessmentFrench-language works237,207