MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Mimics of pancreatic neoplasms at cross-sectional imaging: Pearls for characterization and diagnostic work-up

2024· review· en· W4405237315 on OpenAlexaff
David Salgado, Jessie Kang, Andreu F. Costa

Bibliographic record

VenueCurrent Problems in Diagnostic Radiology · 2024
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
Canadian institutionsQueen Elizabeth II Health Sciences Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePancreasPancreatitisDifferential diagnosisRadiologyAccessory spleenIntraductal papillary mucinous neoplasmPathologyNeoplasmAcute pancreatitisInternal medicineSpleenSplenectomy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Interpreting imaging examinations of the pancreas can be a challenge. Several different entities can mimic or mask pancreatic neoplasms, including normal anatomic variants, non-pancreatic lesions, and both acute and chronic pancreatitis. It is important to distinguish these entities from pancreatic neoplasms, as the management and prognosis of a pancreatic neoplasm, particularly adenocarcinoma, have considerable impact on patients. Normal pancreatic variants that mimic a focal lesion include focal fatty atrophy, annular pancreas, and ectopic pancreas. Extra-pancreatic lesions that can mimic a primary pancreatic neoplasm include vascular lesions, such as arteriovenous malformations and pseudoaneurysms, duodenal diverticula, and intra-pancreatic accessory spleen. Both acute and chronic pancreatitis can mimic or mask a pancreatic neoplasm and are also associated with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Awareness of these entities and their imaging features will enable the radiologist to narrow the differential diagnosis, provide recommendations that expedite diagnosis and avoid unnecessary work-up or delays in patient care.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0080.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.004
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0020.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.086
GPT teacher head0.414
Teacher spread0.328 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCurrent Problems in Diagnostic RadiologySame topicPancreatic and Hepatic Oncology ResearchFrench-language works237,207