Deep learning models for enhanced forest-fire prediction at Mount Kilimanjaro, Tanzania: Integrating satellite images, weather data and human activities data
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Forest fires (FFs) are a growing threat to ecosystems and human settlements, particularly in vulnerable regions such as Mount Kilimanjaro, Tanzania. Accurate and timely fire prediction is essential to mitigate these risks and improve fire management strategies. This study develops and evaluates advanced Deep Learning (DL) models for FF prediction by integrating spatiotemporal vegetation indices, environmental data, and human activity indicators. Specifically, Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM), Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs), and Convolutional Long Short-Term Memory (ConvLSTM) models were employed to analyze Sentinel-2 satellite imagery and weather data, along with anthropogenic factors such as beekeeping, tourism, agriculture, and deforestation rates. Leveraging this diverse, high-dimensional dataset, the ConvLSTM model engineered to capture intricate spatial and temporal relationships delivered superior performance, achieving an AUROC of 0.9785 and Accuracy 98.08%, surpassing the LSTM and CNN models. Integrating human-induced activities with environmental data, these models provide accurate and actionable predictions for fire management in high-risk areas. This study demonstrates the potential of ConvLSTM in developing operational tools for early fire detection, streamlining data-driven decision-making, improving resource allocation, and guiding preventive strategies in fire-prone regions such as Mount Kilimanjaro.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".