MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4405280787 · doi:10.1097/ccm.0000000000006520

Prognostic Factors Associated With Intracranial Hemorrhage and Ischemic Stroke During Venovenous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation: A Systematic Review

2024· review· en· W4405280787 on OpenAlexaff
Sonny Thiara, Alexander J. Willms, Alexandre Tran, Anish R. Mitra, Mypinder S. Sekhon, Ryan L. Hoiland, Donald Griesdale

Bibliographic record

VenueCritical Care Medicine · 2024
Typereview
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMechanical Circulatory Support Devices
Canadian institutionsUniversity of OttawaDalhousie UniversityVancouver General HospitalOttawa HospitalSurrey Memorial HospitalUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineExtracorporeal membrane oxygenationMechanical ventilationStroke (engine)Refractory (planetary science)AnesthesiaRespiratory failureIschemic strokeIntracerebral hemorrhageOxygenationIntensive care medicineIschemiaCardiologySubarachnoid hemorrhage

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVES: Venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is a life-preserving intervention for patients with respiratory failure refractory to conventional mechanical ventilation. Intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) and ischemic stroke are life-threatening complications associated with venovenous ECMO. Despite this, little is known regarding the prognostic factors associated with these adverse neurologic events. We conducted a systematic review that characterizes these predictors of ICH and ischemic stroke during venovenous ECMO. DATA SOURCES: We conducted a comprehensive search of MEDLINE and Embase via the Ovid interface. STUDY SELECTION: We developed and performed a literature search to identify articles that evaluated ICH and ischemic stroke in adult patients undergoing venovenous ECMO. We excluded studies based on design, target population, and outcomes. DATA EXTRACTION: Data were extracted manually by one reviewer. Risk of bias assessment was completed using the Quality in Prognostic Studies approach for each included study. Prognostic factors associated with ICH and ischemic stroke that were identified in two or more included studies were evaluated through the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach. DATA SYNTHESIS: Three hundred thirty-three studies met criteria for screening. Seventeen studies met final inclusion criteria. Seventeen studies addressed predictors of ICH. Five studies demonstrated an increased risk of ICH with lower pH before venovenous ECMO (moderate certainty). Five studies demonstrated an increased risk of ICH with greater decreases in Pa co2 pre- to post-venovenous ECMO cannulation (moderate certainty). Four studies addressed predictors of ischemic stroke; however, there were no predictors of ischemic stroke identified in two or more of the included studies. CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review demonstrates that abnormalities and changes in blood gas parameters from pre- to post-venovenous ECMO cannulation are probably associated with increased risk of ICH. Additional high-quality studies dedicated to probable predictors of these adverse neurologic events are crucial to understanding the pathophysiology of ICH and ischemic stroke in this population and informing clinical practice to mitigate the risk of these life-threatening events.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.009
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.050
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: Systematic review
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.046

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0090.050
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0100.009
Bibliometrics0.0120.013
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.003
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.285
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSystematic review
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCritical Care Medicine→Same topicMechanical Circulatory Support Devices→French-language works237,207→