MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4405284567 · doi:10.18435/vamp29405

What exactly is a nuchal ligament and who exactly has one?

2024· article· en· W4405284567 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Jerald D. Harris

Bibliographic record

VenueVertebrate Anatomy Morphology Palaeontology · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicPaleontology and Evolutionary Biology
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversity of Pennsylvania
KeywordsExtant taxonSkullAnatomyLigamentTaxonBiologyEvolutionary biologyPaleontology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Nuchal ligaments are relatively well understood and have venerable histories of recognition in extant euungulates, canids, elephants, and humans, but whether any anatomical structures in other taxa, both extant and extinct, qualify as nuchal ligaments is unclear because the term ‘nuchal ligament’ lacks a clear, narrow, consistently applied definition. Possible definitions of the term could be etymological, taxonomic, compositional, or morphological/topological, or a combination thereof. Currently, a de facto morphological/topological definition of ‘nuchal ligament’ sensu stricto seems most common: a nuchal ligament is an epaxial, cervical ligament with a funiculus that is elevated above the cervical spinous processes and connected to them only via laminae. However, many references to ‘nuchal ligaments’ in both extant and extinct taxa instead seem to employ a broader, etymological definition that encompasses numerous different compositions, morphologies and topologies. Several, largely untested assumptions have been made about functional and osteological correlates of a nuchal ligament, such as possessing a ‘large’ or ‘heavy’ head and/or a ‘long’ neck, possessing specific features on the occipital region of the skull, and possessing specific morphologies or dimensions of the cervical and cranial thoracic spinous processes. These assumptions have led to corollary assumptions that many extinct tetrapods—particularly those phylogenetically far removed from taxa known to possess them—had nuchal ligaments, but until these presumed correlates are tested and demonstrated in extant taxa, such assumptions remain purely speculative, and alternative cranio-cervical support mechanisms also must be considered. Depending on the definition applied, attributions of nuchal ligaments to extinct taxa, and even to some extant taxa (including humans), may be references to other sorts of morphologically and topologically distinct epaxial structures such as supraspinous ligaments and fibrous septa/raphes that occupy similar anatomical positions as nuchal ligaments sensu stricto. ‘Nuchal ligament’ requires a narrow definition to understand what, if any, features correlate with the presence of the ligament, as well as what taxa have convergently evolved the structure.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.105
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueVertebrate Anatomy Morphology PalaeontologySame topicPaleontology and Evolutionary BiologyFrench-language works237,207