Common Bed Bugs: Non-Viable Hosts for Trypanosoma rangeli Parasites
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The hemoflagellate parasite Trypanosoma rangeli is transmitted by triatomine kissing bugs and may co-infect humans together with its Chagas disease-causing congener T. cruzi. Using real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) and antimicrobial assays, we studied (i) the temporal and spatial distribution of T. rangeli in common bed bugs, Cimex lectularius, following oral ingestion and hemocoelic injection of T. rangeli, and (ii) the immune responses of bed bugs induced by T. rangeli infections. Irrespective of infection mode, no live T. rangeli were present in the bed bugs’ hemolymph, salivary glands, or feces. On day 1 following infection, the bed bugs strongly upregulated the antimicrobial peptide CL-defensin. Following hemocoelic injection of T. rangeli, live parasites were absent in any bed bug tissues examined throughout the 10-day study period. The ingestion of T. rangeli-infected blood had no significant effect on bed bug survival. Our findings indicate that bed bugs disable the development of T. rangeli within their body, in stark contrast to triatomine kissing bugs, which allow the development and transmission of T. rangeli. Our findings help unravel the intricate relationships between bed bugs and trypanosomes, and they contribute to our understanding of vector biology.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".