Rapid Sex Chromosome Turnover in African Clawed Frogs (<i>Xenopus</i>) and the Origins of New Sex Chromosomes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Sex chromosomes of some closely related species are not homologous, and sex chromosome turnover is often attributed to mechanisms that involve linkage to or recombination arrest around sex-determining loci. We examined sex chromosome turnover and recombination landscapes in African clawed frogs (genus Xenopus) with reduced representation genome sequences from 929 individuals from 19 species. We recovered extensive variation in sex chromosomes, including at least eight nonhomologous sex-associated regions-five newly reported here, with most maintaining female heterogamety, but two independent origins of Y chromosomes. Seven of these regions are found in allopolyploid species in the subgenus Xenopus, and all of these reside in one of their two subgenomes, which highlights functional asymmetry between subgenomes. In three species with chromosome-scale genome assemblies (Xenopus borealis, Xenopus laevis, and Xenopus tropicalis), sex-specific recombination landscapes have similar patterns of sex differences in rates and locations of recombination. Across these Xenopus species, sex-associated regions are significantly nearer chromosome ends than expected by chance, even though this is where the ancestral recombination rate is highest in both sexes before the regions became sex associated. As well, expansions of sex-associated recombination arrest occurred multiple times. New information on sex linkage along with among-species variation in female specificity of the sex-determining gene dm-w argues against a "jumping gene" model, where dm-w moves around the genome. The diversity of sex chromosomes in Xenopus raises questions about the roles of natural and sexual selection, polyploidy, the recombination landscape, and neutral processes in driving sex chromosome turnover in animal groups with mostly heterogametic females.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".