VDMUFusion: A Versatile Diffusion Model-Based Unsupervised Framework for Image Fusion
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Image fusion facilitates the integration of information from various source images of the same scene into a composite image, thereby benefiting perception, analysis, and understanding. Recently, diffusion models have demonstrated impressive generative capabilities in the field of computer vision, suggesting significant potential for application in image fusion. The forward process in the diffusion models requires the gradual addition of noise to the original data. However, typical unsupervised image fusion tasks (e.g., infrared-visible, medical, and multi-exposure image fusion) lack ground truth images (corresponding to the original data in diffusion models), thereby preventing the direct application of the diffusion models. To address this problem, we propose a versatile diffusion model-based unsupervised framework for image fusion, termed as VDMUFusion. In the proposed method, we integrate the fusion problem into the diffusion sampling process by formulating image fusion as a weighted average process and establishing appropriate assumptions about the noise in the diffusion model. To simplify the training process, we propose a multi-task learning framework that replaces the original noise prediction network, allowing for simultaneous prediction of noise and fusion weights. Meanwhile, our method employs joint training across various fusion tasks, which significantly improves noise prediction accuracy and yields higher quality fused images compared to training on a single task. Extensive experimental results demonstrate that the proposed method delivers very competitive performance across various image fusion tasks. The code is available at https://github.com/yuliu316316/VDMUFusion.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".