MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4405310337 · doi:10.1016/j.ajoc.2024.102230

Congenital conjunctival cyst detected by prenatal ultrasound

2024· article· en· W4405310337 on OpenAlexaff
Ryan Gabbard, Kenneth Chang, Elizabeth Pogrebniak, Katie Keck, Rakesh M. Patel

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Journal of Ophthalmology Case Reports · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTeratomas and Epidermoid Cysts
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineCystUltrasoundPrenatal ultrasoundPrenatal diagnosisAnatomyPregnancyPathologyFetusRadiologyGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Purpose: The purpose of this manuscript is to report a rare case of an orbital cyst detected intrauterine with sonography. Observation: A 23-year-old female presented for routine prenatal monitoring when an orbital cyst was detected with a transabdominal ultrasound. Uncomplicated cesarean section was performed at 38 weeks gestation with proptosis of the left globe being noted on ophthalmic examination of the newborn. Magnetic resonance imaging was conducted which demonstrated a cystic mass suspicious for lymphatic malformation. Surgical intervention was performed shortly after birth with pathological results demonstrating non-keratinizing squamous epithelium consistent with conjunctivoid variant of dermoid cyst. Post-operative examination demonstrated significant improvement of the exophthalmos with minimal lagophthalmos. Conclusions: Congenital orbital cysts are a rare phenomenon with only a handful of cases being detected during the fetal period. We recommend physicians include this rare variant of dermoid cysts in their differential diagnosis for orbital lesions that can cause proptosis in the fetal period.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.025
Threshold uncertainty score0.763

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.285
Teacher spread0.276 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmerican Journal of Ophthalmology Case ReportsSame topicTeratomas and Epidermoid CystsFrench-language works237,207