Case Study on the Evaluation of Rock Cut Stability for Highways in Egypt: Implications for Transportation Infrastructure and Safety
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study addresses critical stability concerns along a key segment of the Egyptian highway linking Aswan and Cairo, focusing on a one-kilometer rock-cut section that is vital for transportation and commerce. Recent evaluations have highlighted significant rockfall and slope instability risks in this area, posing serious safety challenges. The primary objective is to identify and analyze the factors contributing to slope instability, assess potential rockfall hazards, and recommend effective mitigation strategies. To achieve this, this study employs a comprehensive, multi-faceted methodology. Key variables influencing slope stability are first identified, followed by a detailed analysis of discontinuity data using stereographic projection based on joint surveys. Rockfall propagation distances are then modeled through specialized software, while the Plaxis 2D tool 2023.2(V23.2.0.1059) is applied for advanced numerical modeling of slope behavior. The results indicate a pressing need for mitigation measures to address ongoing instability issues, including planar and wedge failures and raveling rockfalls, which pose considerable safety risks to road users. This study highlights the necessity of a robust and comprehensive mitigation strategy to ensure road safety and support uninterrupted commercial activity along this essential highway.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".