MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

In-Office Suprachoroidal Viscopexy for Acute Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment

2024· letter· en· W4405317847 on OpenAlex
Rajeev H. Muni, Isabela Martins Melo, Sueellen Demian, Tomás Minelli, Hatim Batawi, John Y. Park, Aurora Pecaku

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueJAMA Ophthalmology · 2024
Typeletter
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRetinal and Macular Surgery
Canadian institutionsKensington HealthUniversity of TorontoSt. Michael's Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineRetinal detachmentScleral buckleOphthalmologySurgeryScleral bucklingRetinal

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Importance: In-office suprachoroidal viscopexy (SCVEXY) is a relatively new procedure for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD), but minimal information is available regarding outcomes and safety. Objective: To report outcomes with in-office SCVEXY for primary acute RRD. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective case series was conducted at St Michael's Hospital in Toronto, Ontario, Canada from June 2023 to February 2024 among consecutive patients with primary acute RRDs who presented with retinal tears that were reachable with the current in-office SCVEXY technique in the temporal or nasal retina. Exposure: Suprachoroidal injection of 0.6 mL of sodium hyaluronate, 2.3%, at the break location using a 30-gauge needle with a custom-made guard leaving 1 mm of the needle exposed. Laser retinopexy was applied around the break once reattachment was achieved. Main Outcome and Measures: The primary outcome was primary anatomic reattachment rate with SCVEXY and recovery of function and anatomic integrity. Results: Among 6 patients, 2 patients (33.3%) were female, and mean (SD) patient age was 52.5 (19.7) years. The final follow-up duration for each patient was 510, 420, 360, 360, 330, and 320 days, respectively. Baseline VAs were hand motions, counting fingers, 20/100, 20/100, 20/25, and hand motions for patients 1 through 6, respectively. A dome-shaped suprachoroidal buckle was present in all cases after the procedure. Five of 6 patients (83.3%) achieved anatomic reattachment with no retinal displacement or outer retinal folds, and these patients could resume normal activity immediately after the procedure with no restrictions. The mean (SD) logMAR VA at 3 months was +0.46 (0.34) (Snellen 20/57). The viscoelastic persisted in the suprachoroidal space as confirmed by multimodal imaging for 10, 14, 21, 13, 24, and 14 days, respectively, and the retina remained attached during the entire postoperative follow-up period. One patient's SCVEXY failed due to inadequate viscoelastic at the posterior edge of the retinal break, and this patient underwent a successful pneumatic retinopexy. One patient developed a localized choroidal effusion unrelated to the SCVEXY site following laser retinopexy that resolved in 1 week associated with topical prednisolone, 1%, 4 times daily and cyclopentolate, 1%, twice daily. Conclusions and Relevance: In this case series, the outcomes of these 6 cases suggest that SCVEXY may offer durable retinal reattachment in RRD. However, randomized clinical trial data, larger sample sizes, and longer-term follow-up are necessary to assess the risk-benefit profile of SCVEXY compared with the standard of care.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesResearch integrity
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: Commentary
Teacher disagreement score0.102
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.338
Teacher spread0.313 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it