Political Ramifications and Humanitarian Crises among Sudanese Refugees in Metema, Northwest Ethiopia (1964–91)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study explores the complexity of refugee management, humanitarian crises, and the political and diplomatic challenges of hosting Sudanese refugees camped at Metema from 1964 to 1991. Despite its potential wealth, Sudan has experienced recurring power struggles, military coups, and humanitarian crises that have displaced civilians from their homes. Thousands of Sudanese Ansar civilians displaced from several localities in North Sudan due to devastating conflicts and power struggles between the Ansar political elites and the government of Jaffar al-Nimeiri camped at the Ethiopian border district of Metema (1964–91). The Ansars, who claimed themselves fellows of Imam al-Mahdi, were devoted militant Muslims determined to militarily remove Nimeiri. However, the countermeasures provoked hostility and displaced civilians. The first Ansar refugees camped at Metema in 1964, but a large-scale and massive influx appeared in 1970 and 1976. In 1970 and 1976, Ansar military officers masterminded attempted coups against the Nimeiri regime. When the coups failed, the loyalist forces of Nimeiri destroyed Aba Island, the power base of the Ansars and took repressive measures against the civilians. Frustrated by repressive state measures, Ansars left for Metema and camped at three separate sites until 1991. Overcoming challenges, Ethiopia provided protection and facilitated humanitarian aid to the Sudanese refugees. In sum, Ethiopia attempted to facilitate peace talks between the refugees and the Sudanese government, aimed at repatriating the refugees. However, hosting refugees affected interstate relations and contributed to the entangled diplomacy between both countries. The researcher produces this article based on a critical analysis of untapped archives of the imperial and Derg periods and contemporary periodical sources kept at the Gondar Archive Center. In addition, the researcher conducted in-depth interviews and focus group discussions with selected elders in Gendawuha, Kokit, Kumer, and Metema Yohannes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".