MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4405320762 · doi:10.30683/1927-7229.2024.13.08

Giant Intramuscular Lipoma of the Gluteus: A Case Report and Literature Review

2024· article· en· W4405320762 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Victor Nwagbara, John Adi Ashindoitiang, Theophilus Ipeh Ugbem, Chibuike Martin Meremikwu, Valentine Ikenna Agbo, Maurice Efana Asuquo

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Analytical Oncology · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSarcoma Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineLipomaDifferential diagnosisButtocksMalignancyLesionEchogenicityGluteal musclesRadiologySurgeryPathologyUltrasound

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Lipomas are benign tumors of mesodermal origin composed of mature adipocytes. They are classified into superficial and deep types located in the subcutaneous and subfascial locations respectively. The subfascial is further subdivided into 2 subtypes intermuscular and intramuscular. Presented was a 63 year old woman with a right sided swelling of the buttock in the past 7 months. Clinical, imaging and histologic evaluation resulted in the definitive diagnosis of a giant intramuscular lipoma of the gluteus. The lesion was well circumscribed with a defined pseudo capsule an indication of a benign disease with minimal risk of recurrence when compared to the infiltrative type. Giant intramuscular lipoma should be considered as a differential diagnosis of a gluteal mass. CT scan was useful in the preoperative diagnosis that included the nature of the tumor due to the low attenuation of fat, homogenous echogenicity, well defined capsule that were in favour of a benign lesion than malignancy. This was in addition to the extent of the tumour. Surgical excision provided the definitive diagnosis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0080.007
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0030.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.354
Teacher spread0.335 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Analytical OncologySame topicSarcoma Diagnosis and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207