MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4405322990 · doi:10.1177/10711007241287714

Metatarsal Aneurysmal Bone Cysts Treated With En Bloc Resection and Reconstruction With Fibular Allograft

2024· article· en· W4405322990 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Sam Hajialiloo Sami, Babak Toloue Ghamari, Khalil Kargar Shooroki, Fateme Mohammadi Aniloo, Wael Ammar, Masih Rikhtehgar, Mohammad Mohammadi, Seyed Reza Dehghani Firoozabadi, Shima Nahvizadeh

Bibliographic record

VenueFoot & Ankle International · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBone Tumor Diagnosis and Treatments
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineFibulaMetatarsal bonesSurgeryResectionAneurysmal bone cystFirst metatarsalTibiaOsteotomy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Treatment of Primary metatarsal aneurysmal bone cyst (ABC) with curettage and bone grafting unfortunately has a high recurrence rate, particularly in short tubular bones. This study presents a 16-year experience treating ABCs in the bones of the foot at an orthopaedic oncology referral center. Treatment involved en bloc resection and reconstruction of the defect with fibular allograft in all cases. Retrospectively collected data were used to document the outcomes. METHODS: This retrospective review includes patients with primary metatarsal ABC treated en bloc resection at a single center between 2004 and 2020. Information on the diagnosis, treatment, complications, and outcomes was collected from our database for all eligible patients. Radiologic healing was used as our primary outcome measure. The patient's function was assessed using the Toronto Extremity Salvage Score (TESS) and Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) score. RESULTS: The study included 19 subjects (11 women, 8 men) with a mean age of 18 years (SD 11-35). The average resected length was 4.24 cm (3-6 cm). The mean follow-up time was 79.26 months (28-160 months). The mean TESS score and MSTS were 94.52 and 28.42, respectively. The average healing time was 10.2 weeks. No patient had local recurrence. Arthrodesis was performed in 3 patients because of joint involvement. Repeat surgery was performed for 2 patients, debridement for one because of infection and bone graft for another because of nonunion. One patient had experienced an allograft fracture. CONCLUSION: Based on the Enneking classification, our experience has shown that a reasonable surgical approach for primary active and invasive metatarsal ABC is en bloc resection and reconstruction with fibula allograft. This method has a low risk of recurrence and does not result in significant functional impairment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.069
Threshold uncertainty score0.436

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFoot & Ankle InternationalSame topicBone Tumor Diagnosis and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207