MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4405332491 · doi:10.3390/min14121262

Analysis of Long-Term Thermo–Hydro–Mechanical Behavior in the Near-Field of a Deep Geological Repository System

2024· article· en· W4405332491 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Mahsa Shafaei Bajestani, Othman Nasir

Bibliographic record

VenueMinerals · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSoil and Unsaturated Flow
Canadian institutionsStantec (Canada)University of New Brunswick
FundersNew Brunswick Innovation Foundation
KeywordsTerm (time)Field (mathematics)GeologyEnvironmental scienceGeotechnical engineeringEarth scienceMining engineeringPhysicsMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The deep geological repository (DGR) system has been selected by most of the world’s nuclear waste management organizations for the long-term disposal of radioactive wastes. The DGR mainly consists of a multi-barrier system—comprising the natural host rock and an engineered barrier system—to contain and isolate high-level radioactive waste, including used fuel containers (UFCs), to protect humans and the environment. Bentonite materials and host rock are the main components of the DGR’s engineered and natural barrier system, respectively. It is crucial to understand the coupled behavior of bentonite and rock materials under various in situ conditions over long-term durations, as it supports safety assessments and enhances the overall safety level of DGR systems. This study presents a methodology for the numerical modeling of a hypothetical DGR using developed coupled models. The developed model was used to investigate the hydromechanical (HM) and thermomechanical (TM) response within the near-field (the area within a radius of 50 m near the UFC and multiple-barrier system) of a simplified hypothetical DGR, based on the proposed design concept of the Nuclear Waste Management Organization (NWMO) of Canada. The analysis results included the evolution of temperature, thermal stresses, saturation, and swelling pressure at different stages of the DGR system’s lifetime. The results indicated that it could take up to 10,000 years to fully saturate the bentonite materials with a corresponding swelling pressure of 2.7 MPa associated with a decrease in the rock’s strength/stress ratio near the placement room; however, the ratio did not indicate a significant system failure. Sensitivity analysis was also conducted to assess the impact of various parameters on the saturation time and the strength/stress ratio in a DGR. The results highlighted that saturation time was highly influenced by the permeability of both the rock formation and the bentonite, resulting in saturation times ranging from 500 to 20,000 years. Moreover, the strength/stress ratio was found to be sensitive to the model’s parameters, particularly the maximum swelling pressure. The results of the TM analysis show that temperature development around the placement of rooms in a DGR is highly influenced by room spacing, with a lower factor of safety (FOS) as time and temperature progressed due to elevated temperature, while the rock remained stable over the 150-year analysis period. The inclusion of temperature-dependent mechanical properties produced negligible changes to the overall stability of the rock around the placement rooms of the DGR.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.744
Threshold uncertainty score0.254

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2024
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMineralsSame topicSoil and Unsaturated FlowFrench-language works237,207