An Interpretation and Understanding of Human Emotion Fear Through Bhayanaka Rasa in Dina Mehta’s Brides Are Not For Burning
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This research delves into the subtle exploration of human emotions, specifically honing in on the depiction of fear through the artistic lens of Bhayanaka Rasa in Dina Mehta's play, Brides Are Not for Burning. Emotions are a fundamental aspect of the human condition, and this study aims to uncover the complex layers of fear as portrayed in the narrative. Drawing inspiration from classical Indian aesthetics, as well as performing and theatrical arts, Bhayanaka Rasa encompasses a multifaceted range of emotions associated with fear, horror, and apprehension. By examining Mehta's portrayal and its impact, this research enriches our interpretation and comprehension of the significant role played by Bhayanaka Rasa in evoking and navigating feelings of fear and agitation. Utilizing a descriptive qualitative approach, this study examines the encapsulation, manifestation, and expression of Bhayanaka Rasa by the characters and situations, providing valuable insights into the convergence of emotions, artistic portrayal, and human experiences. By shedding light on the interpretative aspects of fear within the drama, this research enriches the ongoing conversation on emotions in literature, presenting a significant viewpoint on the thoughtful influence of apprehension in the domain of dramatic representation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".