MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4405360069 · doi:10.1016/j.aim.2024.110080

Making the motivic group structure on the endomorphisms of the projective line explicit

2024· article· en· W4405360069 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Viktor Balch Barth, William Hornslien, Gereon Quick, Glen Matthew Wilson

Bibliographic record

VenueAdvances in Mathematics · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicAlgebraic Geometry and Number Theory
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersCenter for Advanced Study, University of Illinois at Urbana-ChampaignNorges ForskningsrådRéseau de cancérologie RossyTrond Mohn stiftelse
KeywordsMathematicsEndomorphismProjective testProjective linePure mathematicsGroup (periodic table)Line (geometry)Projective representationAlgebra over a fieldProjective spaceGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We construct a group structure on the set of pointed naive\nhomotopy classes of scheme morphisms from the Jouanolou\ndevice to the projective line. The group operation is defined\nvia matrix multiplication on generating sections of line bundles and only requires basic algebraic geometry. In particular,\nit is completely independent of the construction of the motivic\nhomotopy category. We show that a particular scheme morphism, which exhibits the Jouanolou device as an affine torsor bundle over the projective line, induces a monoid morphism\nfrom Cazanave’s monoid to this group. Moreover, we show\nthat this monoid morphism is a group completion to a subgroup of the group of scheme morphisms from the Jouanolou\ndevice to the projective line. This subgroup is generated by a\nset of morphisms that are very simple to describe.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.329
Teacher spread0.288 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAdvances in MathematicsSame topicAlgebraic Geometry and Number TheoryFrench-language works237,207