MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4405362204 · doi:10.1115/ipc2024-133554

Innovations in Long Gas Pipeline Loading Procedures: Staged Pressure Method From High-Pressure Rich Natural Gas

2024· article· en· W4405362204 on OpenAlexaff
K. K. Botros, Dale Strandlund, Douglas Caruth, Ole Yin

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicEngineering Structural Analysis Methods
Canadian institutionsNova Chemicals (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNatural gasPipeline (software)Petroleum engineeringGas pressureGas pipelineHigh pressureComputer scienceEnvironmental scienceGeologyMechanical engineeringEngineeringWaste managementEngineering physics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Current trends in long gas transmission systems are to operate at high pressures in the dense phase region. When the gas is rich in composition, i.e. containing appreciable amounts of C2+, as well as relatively higher water, problems arise during loading newly constructed large diameter and long pipelines, e.g. 600+ km. In such a case, condensate dropping out and hydrates formation can occur downstream of the throttling loading valves due to Joule-Thomson (T-J) effects causing potential flooding of Hydrocarbon (HC) condensation and plugging due to hydrates formation in the pipeline near the loading location. In order to circumvent this, an innovative procedure was ideated and implemented on a newly constructed NPS 48, 640 km long gas pipeline in a cold environment where hydrocarbon condensation and hydrates formation are imminent as the supply pressure is in the dense phase and the temperature is relatively low. The new procedure is based on loading every sub-section to an intermediate pressure first, e.g. 50% of the supply pressure upstream, then the next sub-section will be loaded from the upstream sub-section now maintained at the intermediate pressure. In this case, the isenthalpic expansion of the gas from the intermediate pressure will be clear of intersecting the hydrate equilibrium line corresponding to the water content in the supply gas, and only a small amount of HC condensate could drop out. The loading process starts with partially filling of the very first upstream from the high pressure to an optimally determined intermedium pressure. Once this step is completed, the rest of the pipeline sections between Main Line Block Valves (MLBVs) can be loaded, from the now, intermediate pressure in the section upstream, and sequentially to the following section(s) between consecutive MLBVs. The third step is then to load the upstream sections (again in sequential manner) to the full supply pressure. Hence, the new concept is called “staged-pressure loading”. The paper describes the new procedure along with an example of specific loading conditions which was implemented successfully on an NPS 48, 640 km long transmission line. No appreciable hydrates or HC condensate were observed during loading based on the new procedure.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicEngineering Structural Analysis MethodsFrench-language works237,207